<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Five For Fitness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/2010/01/five-for-fitness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/2010/01/five-for-fitness/</link>
	<description>ATL rocks</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 17:47:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yoga and Pilates &#8211; Do You Need Pilates Exercise Equipment</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/2010/01/five-for-fitness/comment-page-1/#comment-980</link>
		<dc:creator>Yoga and Pilates &#8211; Do You Need Pilates Exercise Equipment</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 23:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/?p=2589#comment-980</guid>
		<description>[...] Five For Fitness [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Five For Fitness [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Whitworth</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/2010/01/five-for-fitness/comment-page-1/#comment-926</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Whitworth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 15:05:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/?p=2589#comment-926</guid>
		<description>Hi
Five different people and five different ways of keeping fit. I think the message here should be clear to anyone looking to get fit or lose weight. Do something you enjoy. 
I am with Jason on this, as I have recently returned to my bike after many years.
My fitness levels as a result have really surprised me.

His advice about recovery is good too. You can easily get carried away when you first start a new regime and this can lead to overtraining and injury.

Keep Moving
Dave W</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi<br />
Five different people and five different ways of keeping fit. I think the message here should be clear to anyone looking to get fit or lose weight. Do something you enjoy.<br />
I am with Jason on this, as I have recently returned to my bike after many years.<br />
My fitness levels as a result have really surprised me.</p>
<p>His advice about recovery is good too. You can easily get carried away when you first start a new regime and this can lead to overtraining and injury.</p>
<p>Keep Moving<br />
Dave W</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike Vandeman</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/2010/01/five-for-fitness/comment-page-1/#comment-921</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike Vandeman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 02 Jan 2010 01:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/?p=2589#comment-921</guid>
		<description>What nonsense! It&#039;s socially and environmentally irresponsible to stay &quot;fit&quot; at the expense of wildlife and other trail users.

Bicycles should not be allowed in any natural area. They are inanimate objects and have no rights. There is also no right to mountain bike. That was settled in federal court in 1994:
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/mtb10 . It&#039;s dishonest of mountain bikers to say that they don&#039;t have access to trails closed to bikes.
They have EXACTLY the same access as everyone else -- ON FOOT! Why isn&#039;t that good enough for mountain bikers? They are all capable of walking....

A favorite myth of mountain bikers is that mountain biking is no more harmful to wildlife, people, and the environment than hiking, and that science supports that view. Of course, it&#039;s not true. To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts (see
http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/scb7 ). I found that of the seven studies they cited, (1) all were written by mountain bikers, and (2) in every case, the authors misinterpreted their own data, in order to come to the conclusion that they favored. They also studiously avoided mentioning another scientific study (Wisdom et al) which did not favor mountain biking, and came to the opposite conclusions.

Those were all experimental studies. Two other studies (by White et al and by Jeff Marion) used a survey design, which is inherently incapable of answering that question (comparing hiking with mountain biking). I only mention them because mountain bikers often cite them, but scientifically, they are worthless.

Mountain biking accelerates erosion, creates V-shaped ruts, kills small animals and plants on and next to the trail, drives wildlife and other trail users out of the area, and (worst of all) teaches kids that the rough treatment of nature is okay (it&#039;s NOT!). What&#039;s good about THAT?

For more information: http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/mtbfaq .</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What nonsense! It&#8217;s socially and environmentally irresponsible to stay &#8220;fit&#8221; at the expense of wildlife and other trail users.</p>
<p>Bicycles should not be allowed in any natural area. They are inanimate objects and have no rights. There is also no right to mountain bike. That was settled in federal court in 1994:<br />
<a href="http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/mtb10" rel="nofollow">http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/mtb10</a> . It&#8217;s dishonest of mountain bikers to say that they don&#8217;t have access to trails closed to bikes.<br />
They have EXACTLY the same access as everyone else &#8212; ON FOOT! Why isn&#8217;t that good enough for mountain bikers? They are all capable of walking&#8230;.</p>
<p>A favorite myth of mountain bikers is that mountain biking is no more harmful to wildlife, people, and the environment than hiking, and that science supports that view. Of course, it&#8217;s not true. To settle the matter once and for all, I read all of the research they cited, and wrote a review of the research on mountain biking impacts (see<br />
<a href="http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/scb7" rel="nofollow">http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/scb7</a> ). I found that of the seven studies they cited, (1) all were written by mountain bikers, and (2) in every case, the authors misinterpreted their own data, in order to come to the conclusion that they favored. They also studiously avoided mentioning another scientific study (Wisdom et al) which did not favor mountain biking, and came to the opposite conclusions.</p>
<p>Those were all experimental studies. Two other studies (by White et al and by Jeff Marion) used a survey design, which is inherently incapable of answering that question (comparing hiking with mountain biking). I only mention them because mountain bikers often cite them, but scientifically, they are worthless.</p>
<p>Mountain biking accelerates erosion, creates V-shaped ruts, kills small animals and plants on and next to the trail, drives wildlife and other trail users out of the area, and (worst of all) teaches kids that the rough treatment of nature is okay (it&#8217;s NOT!). What&#8217;s good about THAT?</p>
<p>For more information: <a href="http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/mtbfaq" rel="nofollow">http://home.pacbell.net/mjvande/mtbfaq</a> .</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Atlanta Thrashers &#124; Atlanta Thrashers NHL Announcer</title>
		<link>http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/2010/01/five-for-fitness/comment-page-1/#comment-919</link>
		<dc:creator>Atlanta Thrashers &#124; Atlanta Thrashers NHL Announcer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 Jan 2010 23:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.atlantaintownpaper.com/?p=2589#comment-919</guid>
		<description>[...] Five For Fitness &#124; Atlanta INtown Paper [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Five For Fitness | Atlanta INtown Paper [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

